Physical beings: dimensional gatekeepers?

[DoesnMatter]

I asked some questions to my inner being and received some very intense answers. I was guided trough several stages of understanding. Yet, there is so much more to it then I understand of it still.

In a sense, I saw my self at a hill at night, with vision over a beach boulevard with lots of humans interacting, lights and buildings and stores of all sorts. From afar, I was not in the boulevard. I was up here at the hillside. I thought, why am I here? And then it hit me... I felt like flying is the best way to go from here to there. The most fun way. The most intuitive way. I know that trying to walk there, my current dimension of experience of being at a hillside watching the boulevard would fail to shift to that experience of being at the boulevard of THAT specific frequency vibration. I know these things intuitively because we're all dimensional gatekeepers?

As I see how dimensions of experience relate to eachother, I feel intuively how I can shift from one to the next. I just know! So much knowingness and experience just flows trough my being in an intant. For example, I have the vision of the dimension of being at the hillside. Its a guy who is bored with his girl doing something at the car. He's wanting to have more fun and feels very distant from that fun. So a walking over to that boulevard would enforce his boredom. In the walking towards the boulevard, he would not be shifting towards that dimension of experience, he would be shifting AWAY from it! Why? "Walking" towards a fun that is far away is disaligned with the dimension experience of being in that boulevard of that specific frequency of vibration / experience of interaction with people in fun ways and the openness and willingness of the people there to do so. So walking, he would either slip and fall all the way of the hill, drop in the sea and loose vision over the boulevard. Walking towards it, he would find the boulevard becoming smaller and smaller, untill there is nothing there anymore. And the guy just forgets about the dimension even existing alltogether. Looses sight over it, being so caught up in the process of walking and shifting.

So, flying would be the path of least resistance. It is the specific gateway of experience for his current experience. As the person flies, his frequency already raises, and is able to match that of the boulevard. The freedom that is held in the being of every single one of those people he shall interact with at that boulevard. We here at physical reality allow experience to lead to greater experience. The gateway to all experience. We are in a sense embracing limitation in order to discover the path of least resistance. To become more yielding like water, and practice allowance.

I have received these knowingness, in my allowing of the answers of several questions about the importance of physical reality. Does abraham ever talk about the reason for physical reality? I mean, in relationship to non-physical, not the reason of its existance. But the rason for us being here in the physical rather then non-physical, or less limited reality experience. One where we simply are here and then there. No in betweenness. No shifting, no process of teleportation in a sense. Just instant being whereever you be. When in our experience, to enter the experience of a supermarket, we choose to have a process of shifting from home to the car, which is more connected to the supermarket. From the parking place to the road, which is yet more aligned with being in the supermarket. So, did Abraham ever spoke about why we don't just remain in non-physical reality where we can just be here at the supermarket and just be here at home, or however we may choose to define this moment and place. Does she ever talk about why non-physical has chosen to enter the physical? I hope the question makes sense in relation to what I've said so far.

[RAWR]

This is very weird. LOA of attraction at it's best. I was just thinking about inner beings and dimensional shifts. I felt coming here and was very surprised to find this thread! I manifested it without even trying!
May I ask you how you communicate with your inner being?

[DoesnMatter]

Haha, sorry, I just have to say this first.... I just had the weirdest of revelations. Suddenly I felt the urge the say "I am already in non-physical... Welcome!" I just realize... I AM MY INNER BEING! I have created this physical reality experience for myself, by shifting so much from dimension to dimension, I have created a reality where a dimensional shifting has become a dimensional experience unto itself! Where I can be experiencing all of the dimensions of experience, yet condense them all into one dimension of experience (physical reality) and have them interact with eachother.

Inner being: "you are at the cusp of all experience." no idea what that means, but it sounds deep. Cusp might indicate the intersection between the diffrent architectual shapes of all the unique dimensional experiences out there. Thats whats ment with being a dimensional gatekeeper! Thats why my inner being says this physical reality is valuable to me beyond my wildest dreams! It is the leading edge of thought. It is the fruit of eternal flowers of all kinds and shapes, opening simultaneously as one.

[DoesnMatter]

This is very weird. LOA of attraction at it's best. I was just thinking about inner beings and dimensional shifts. I felt coming here and was very surprised to find this thread! I manifested it without even trying!
May I ask you how you communicate with your inner being?

Oki doki, now to your question. I just want to point out you already answered your own question.
"I manifested without even trying!"

Haha! Its all about allowing, trusting, surrendering, knowing, allowing, flowing, letting go, letting be.
Have you heard about my definition of allowance? Allowance = an act of non-action
It is an eternal act of truth and creation. This is how your inner being or source creates all of existance. The one as all as one. As existance itself, it does nothing and thus leaves nothing undone!

The "being" that you are seeking is not the same as the "wanting" of that being. If I want to be answered, I do not offer a vibration of "wanting" the answer. I let that go and just simply start offering a vibration of "I am receiving the answer from the highest possible source of all of creation for the benefit of my greatest good." thats how it feels when I do it, but you have to realize, the words that can be spoken are not the unchanging true words. You have to look beyond words. Let go of all and start to feel and allow the answer to arise from the inner most depths of your being trough the clarity of your silent mind.

Allowing, as an act of non-action, is the greatest and most powerfull of all actions in existance, it is the only true action in existance and it is absolutely 100% EFFORTLESS, NO ACTION, WITHOUT ACTION OR EFFORT. This is why "effort" is infact a "disbelieve" and "distrust" in your being. Action of action reprsents resistance. It represents a "boundary" a "definition" a "name" which is all but everr more in constant change and nevermore unchanging as the one truth of "existance itself." . A perfect act is effortless. It is an act of ceasing to act. Just like you don't need effort to breath. You don't need effort to create the experience of your own reality. So just simply allow yourself to experience what you wish. Have fun with it

Actually, breathing is kinda fun. Its like breathing in, you desire, ask, and breathing out, you surrender, let go and allow the answer to be. To return to source with your new desire. Like life and death. Wanting and having. Yet, realize that all these paradoxes only appear to contradict eachother. In reality, THEY DEFINE EACHOTHER! You are at the center of all of them. It is your point of power.

[Marc]

Does abraham ever talk about the reason for physical reality? I mean, in relationship to non-physical, not the reason of its existance. But the rason for us being here in the physical rather then non-physical, or less limited reality experience.

Yes, they explain that physical reality is an extension of non-physical. Not just an extension, the LEADING EDGE extension of non-physical. There are a couple of reasons for that -- first, it was intended to have exaggerated contrast, and by contrast I mean variety. The bigger the contrast, the bigger the desire born out of that contrast. The contrast in non-physical is much more subtle. Second, Abraham describes non-physical as very GENERAL, where the physical is SPECIFIC. We came here to enjoy this leading edge physical reality to enjoy our very specific points of view while being in alignment with non-physical, which they describe as the most delicious thing in all creation.

One where we simply are here and then there. No in betweenness. No shifting, no process of teleportation in a sense. Just instant being whereever you be. When in our experience, to enter the experience of a supermarket, we choose to have a process of shifting from home to the car, which is more connected to the supermarket. From the parking place to the road, which is yet more aligned with being in the supermarket. So, did Abraham ever spoke about why we don't just remain in non-physical reality where we can just be here at the supermarket and just be here at home, or however we may choose to define this moment and place. Does she ever talk about why non-physical has chosen to enter the physical? I hope the question makes sense in relation to what I've said so far.

A lot of the issues you're having with this question is that while they're logical from an out of the Vortex standpoint, they're just that -- indicators that you're out of the Vortex. Your presence in this physical reality belies the notion that in-between-ness is a sign of lack of freedom. From broader perspective, the whole point is the in-between-ness. As Abraham often explains, when you go on vacation, you never say, "Oh, my ultimate destination is home, so I can just stay home and cross that off my list." Rather, you're aware that the whole point of vacation is enjoying the journey. That's the perspective you had when you chose to enter this physical reality, it's the perspective you're regain when you croak, and it's available to you now.

It's really an issue of looking at the doughnut and seeing the hole, rather than the tasty dough that's there for you to enjoy. Is limitation a valid conclusion you can reach about this physical experience? Absolutely, you're free to choose that sort of experience. Is that the ONLY way of viewing the experience? Is it an intrinsic, necessary part of the experience? Absolutely not. All of it is perceptual -- and that's what is at the heart of this physical experience. You're allowed to choose anything you decide to experience (even if you're not quite sure that you're choosing it, or how) -- and LOA will actualize that experience for you. You want to experience limitation? Focus on it and LOA dutifully brings it into your experience. You want to experience freedom? Focus on it and LOA will match that in your experience as well. It will bring anything in between for you as well, you get to choose.

[DoesnMatter]

Yes, they explain that physical reality is an extension of non-physical. Not just an extension, the LEADING EDGE extension of non-physical. There are a couple of reasons for that -- first, it was intended to have exaggerated contrast, and by contrast I mean variety. The bigger the contrast, the bigger the desire born out of that contrast. The contrast in non-physical is much more subtle. Second, Abraham describes non-physical as very GENERAL, where the physical is SPECIFIC. We came here to enjoy this leading edge physical reality to enjoy our very specific points of view while being in alignment with non-physical, which they describe as the most delicious thing in all creation.


A lot of the issues you're having with this question is that while they're logical from an out of the Vortex standpoint, they're just that -- indicators that you're out of the Vortex. Your presence in this physical reality belies the notion that in-between-ness is a sign of lack of freedom. From broader perspective, the whole point is the in-between-ness. As Abraham often explains, when you go on vacation, you never say, "Oh, my ultimate destination is home, so I can just stay home and cross that off my list." Rather, you're aware that the whole point of vacation is enjoying the journey. That's the perspective you had when you chose to enter this physical reality, it's the perspective you're regain when you croak, and it's available to you now.

It's really an issue of looking at the doughnut and seeing the hole, rather than the tasty dough that's there for you to enjoy. Is limitation a valid conclusion you can reach about this physical experience? Absolutely, you're free to choose that sort of experience. Is that the ONLY way of viewing the experience? Is it an intrinsic, necessary part of the experience? Absolutely not. All of it is perceptual -- and that's what is at the heart of this physical experience. You're allowed to choose anything you decide to experience (even if you're not quite sure that you're choosing it, or how) -- and LOA will actualize that experience for you. You want to experience limitation? Focus on it and LOA dutifully brings it into your experience. You want to experience freedom? Focus on it and LOA will match that in your experience as well. It will bring anything in between for you as well, you get to choose.

hi, marc. Thanks very much for this beautiful response. I like it.

In a sense, all of this came in response to my perceived failure to teleport to where I know I am. I realized that my mind knows it is somewhere and perceives that in a certain way. Yet, the outside perceived reality still echo's the reflection of my current being that I am having a hard time to let go of. So I'm standing in my own way in a sense. Not for me to hate this self imposed limitation or self, which would reinforce the limitation that exists here. Rather, to love them. When the way it is is perfect, the way it is, can become another way.

You are right about being out of the vortex. I know exactly what I need to know, yet I kinda pretended I did not, and introduced resistance. I sometimes distrust certain aspects of my being just for the fun of it. I mean, we're here anyway, why not experience it fully right? Hehe... I know its very easy to let go of resistance. All is well. The most complex of all is the simplicity of all of existance. For if you understand the simplicity, you will have overcome the highest form of complexity there is to overcome. "the unwillingness surrender to the simplicity" which is also simple, when viewed with allowance.

[CreatorChristine]

Is limitation a valid conclusion you can reach about this physical experience? Absolutely, you're free to choose that sort of experience.

This nugget buried in a mountain of nuggets deserves highlighting in my opinion. This is so much bigger than just the words corroborating Absolute Freedom. And it is something that many don't recognize or neglect to Appreciate fully - commonly reflected in the question, "Why would we do this to ourselves and come into Physical Focus?"

As Abraham say: We are so Free we can CHOOSE bondage. WE FROM OUR PHYSICALLY FOCUSED PERSPECTIVE HAVE THAT CHOICE. What I've never heard them say, though, which I feel is nonetheless IMPLICIT in those words, is: From our Non-Physical perspective, we DO NOT HAVE that same degree of Freedom of Choice - there is contrast even from the Non-Physical perspective but it is so imperceptible that the Emotional Range goes from Joy to More Joy, Joy to More Joy. That FREEDOM to CHOOSE is far greater "here" on the Leading Edge. I feel that is something we would do well to APPRECIATE far more.


Christine